VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

GLM-5.2 vs Hy4

16 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 16 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores higher on 2 and Hy4 on 14. The widest gap is Program Bench, where GLM-5.2 scores 63.7 against 17.5. Hy4 is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.83 against $1.40 per million input tokens).

Z.AIVSTENCENT16 SHARED214 HEAD-TO-HEAD
BenchmarkGLM-5.2MARGINHy4
apexAgents35.637.1
critpt20.916.9
cybergym77.278.4
DeepSWE46.264.3
GPQA Diamond91.292.3
JobBench43.461.7
MCP Atlas82.683.7
nl2repo48.958.9
officeqa_pro41.466.2
SWE-Marathon19.431.9
toolathlon48.274.1

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (zai-official, tencent), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare GLM-5.2 withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic12 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google11 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek5 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai1 PAIRING
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA1 PAIRING