GLM-5.3 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash RL
7 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 7 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 scores higher on 2 and MiMo V2.6 Flash RL on 5. The widest gap is Terminal-Bench 4.0, where GLM-5.3 scores 41.8 against 28.8. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $1.40 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates: Artificial Analysis for GLM-5.3; the Hugging Face repository date for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. Prices: Z.ai's own price page for GLM-5.3; deepinfra for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
GLM-5.3 pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
MiMo V2.6 Flash RL pulls furthest ahead on
- Terminal-Bench 2.187.6 vs 83.9
Every shared benchmark7 · grouped by area
Coding 1
Other shared benchmarks 6
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (zai-official, deepinfra), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.