GLM-5.3 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
17 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 17 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.3 scores higher on 4 and MiMo V2.6 Pro on 13. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience, where GLM-5.3 scores 14.3 against 8.4. MiMo V2.6 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $1.40 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Z.ai's own price page for GLM-5.3; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
GLM-5.3 pulls furthest ahead on
- Terminal-Bench 4.041.9 vs 34.8
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination70.4 vs 59.4
MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- CritPt26.6 vs 19.1
- Humanity's Last Exam49.4 vs 42.3
- AA-LCR86.3 vs 79.7
Every shared benchmark17 · grouped by area
Reasoning 2
Coding 2
Agentic 2
Factuality 2
Long Context 1
Other shared benchmarks 8
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (zai-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.