MiMo V2.6 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 22 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software02MiMo V2.6 Pro2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02MiMo V2.6 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01MiMo V2.6 Pro1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own11Even1 each
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
MiMo V2.6 Pro costs 78% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+7.5points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+7.1points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+6.6points ahead
Where GLM-5.3 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+11points ahead
- Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+7.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 22 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMiMo V2.6 Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1MiMo V2.6 Pro by 683.989.9+6
- SciCodeMiMo V2.6 Pro by 1.95960.9+1.9
- LMArena · WebDevtie16221625tie
AgentsEven
- Terminal-Bench 4.0GLM-5.3 by 7.141.934.8+7.1
- GDPValMiMo V2.6 Pro by 1.757.559.2+1.7
ReasoningMiMo V2.6 Pro
- CritPtMiMo V2.6 Pro by 7.519.126.6+7.5
- Humanity's Last ExamMiMo V2.6 Pro by 7.142.349.4+7.1
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGLM-5.3 by 1170.459.4+11
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMiMo V2.6 Pro by 133.934.9+1
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- CyberGymMiMo V2.6 Pro by 9.584.594+9.5
- GDP (Surge AI)MiMo V2.6 Pro by 811.219.2+8
- Program BenchMiMo V2.6 Pro by 7.51926.5+7.5
- Terminal-Bench 4.0GLM-5.3 by 6.941.834.9+6.9
- AA-OmniscienceGLM-5.3 by 5.914.38.4+5.9
- DeepSWE 1.1MiMo V2.6 Pro by 566.971.9+5
- Toolathlon VerifiedMiMo V2.6 Pro by 3.97376.9+3.9
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1GLM-5.3 by 3.89.55.7+3.8
- Agents' Last ExamMiMo V2.6 Pro by 3.128.531.6+3.1
- HLE-DiamondGLM-5.3 by 2.717.915.2+2.7
- AA IntelligenceMiMo V2.6 Pro by 1.544.846.3+1.5
- CritPt v2 Hardtie33.534tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, GLM-5.3 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?
MiMo V2.6 Pro wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and long documents. GLM-5.3 wins none. They are level on agents and facts.
Which is better for coding?
MiMo V2.6 Pro. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; GLM-5.3 wins none, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
GLM-5.3 costs $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; MiMo V2.6 Pro costs $0.43 and $0.87. That makes MiMo V2.6 Pro about 78% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 22 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.