Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Kimi K2 Instruct

IBM · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

Moonshot · released

Wins 6 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions

Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is cheaper.

Scores updated · 30 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct$0.03 to read · $0.25 to write$0.28Price from Artificial Analysis
Kimi K2 Instruct$0.60 to read · $2.50 to write$3.10Price from Artificial Analysis

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs 91% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K2 Instruct pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+49.7points aheadKimi K2 Instruct53Granite 3.3 8B Instruct3.3
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+42.9points aheadKimi K2 Instruct76.7Granite 3.3 8B Instruct33.8
  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+26.5points aheadKimi K2 Instruct30.3Granite 3.3 8B Instruct3.8

Where Granite 3.3 8B Instruct pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 30 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K2 Instruct

Full coding ranking

AgentsKimi K2 Instruct
  • GDPValKimi K2 Instruct by 18.2018.2+18.2

Full agents ranking

ReasoningKimi K2 Instruct

Full reasoning ranking

FactsKimi K2 Instruct

Full facts ranking

Long documentsKimi K2 Instruct
  • AA-LCRKimi K2 Instruct by 49.73.353+49.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsKimi K2 Instruct
  • IFBenchKimi K2 Instruct by 19.322.441.7+19.3

Full following instructions ranking

Other results19 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct or Kimi K2 Instruct?

Kimi K2 Instruct wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct wins none, but costs 91% less.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K2 Instruct. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Granite 3.3 8B Instruct wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Instruct costs $0.60 and $2.50. That makes Granite 3.3 8B Instruct about 91% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 30 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 19 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.