Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Granite 4.1 30B vs Granite 4.1 3B

IBM · released

Wins 6 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions

IBM · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

Granite 4.1 30B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 44 tests both models report · How we compare

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Granite 4.1 30B pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+17.7points aheadGranite 4.1 30B23.7Granite 4.1 3B6
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+16.7points aheadGranite 4.1 30B48.1Granite 4.1 3B31.4
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+13.9points aheadGranite 4.1 30B25.8Granite 4.1 3B11.9

Where Granite 4.1 3B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 44 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGranite 4.1 30B

Full coding ranking

AgentsGranite 4.1 30B

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGranite 4.1 30B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGranite 4.1 30B

Full facts ranking

Long documentsGranite 4.1 30B
  • AA-LCRGranite 4.1 30B by 17.723.76+17.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsGranite 4.1 30B
  • IFBenchGranite 4.1 30B by 10.744.433.7+10.7

Full following instructions ranking

Other results33 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Granite 4.1 30B or Granite 4.1 3B?

Granite 4.1 30B wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Granite 4.1 3B wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Granite 4.1 30B. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Granite 4.1 3B wins none, and 1 is a tie.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 44 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 33 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.