Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Granite 4.1 3B vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

IBM · released

Wins 0 of 5 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 5 of 5 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 27 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Granite 4.1 3BNo current price is tracked.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B$0.47 to read · $0.49 to write$0.97Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+17.7points aheadQwen2.5 Instruct 72B49.1Granite 4.1 3B31.4
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+14.8points aheadQwen2.5 Instruct 72B26.7Granite 4.1 3B11.9
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+14points aheadQwen2.5 Instruct 72B20Granite 4.1 3B6

Where Granite 4.1 3B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 27 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Full coding ranking

ReasoningQwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Full facts ranking

Long documentsQwen2.5 Instruct 72B
  • AA-LCRQwen2.5 Instruct 72B by 14620+14

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen2.5 Instruct 72B
  • IFBenchQwen2.5 Instruct 72B by 3.233.736.9+3.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results18 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Granite 4.1 3B or Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B?

Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Granite 4.1 3B wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Granite 4.1 3B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 27 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 18 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.