Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Granite 4.2 8B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

IBM · released

Wins 4 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Long documents · Following instructions

NVIDIA · released

Wins 1 of 6 areas

Reasoning

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger all-rounder.NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper and better at reasoning.

Scores updated · 23 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Granite 4.2 8B$0.06 to read · $0.25 to write$0.31Price from Artificial Analysis
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.05 to read · $0.20 to write$0.25Price from Artificial Analysis

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 19% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Granite 4.2 8B pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+51.3points aheadGranite 4.2 8B68NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B16.7
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+11.7points aheadGranite 4.2 8B18.4NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B6.7
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+8.9points aheadGranite 4.2 8B47.7NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B38.8

Where NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+12.6points aheadNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B75.7Granite 4.2 8B63.1
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+6.1points aheadNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B17.3Granite 4.2 8B11.2
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.7points aheadNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B11.4Granite 4.2 8B9.7

Every test, side by side

All 23 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGranite 4.2 8B

Full coding ranking

AgentsGranite 4.2 8B

Full agents ranking

ReasoningNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsGranite 4.2 8B
  • AA-LCRGranite 4.2 8B by 74538+7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsGranite 4.2 8B
  • IFBenchGranite 4.2 8B by 8.279.371.1+8.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results9 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Granite 4.2 8B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, long documents and following instructions. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins reasoning, and costs 19% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B. It wins 3 of the 4 coding tests both models report; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.05 and $0.20. That makes NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B about 19% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 23 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.