InternVL3_5-2B vs LFM2.5-VL-3B
Wins 0 of 2 areas
—
Wins 2 of 2 areas
Images and charts · Following instructions
LFM2.5-VL-3B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 28 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Following instructions rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where LFM2.5-VL-3B pulls ahead
Where InternVL3_5-2B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 28 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsLFM2.5-VL-3B
Following instructionsLFM2.5-VL-3B
- IFBenchLFM2.5-VL-3B by 1.424.425.8+1.4
Other results22 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- IFEvalLFM2.5-VL-3B by 49.932.482.3+49.9
- MM-IFEvalLFM2.5-VL-3B by 13.547.160.6+13.5
- RealWorldQALFM2.5-VL-3B by 11.561.673.1+11.5
- Multilingual MMBenchLFM2.5-VL-3B by 8.670.979.5+8.6
- TextVQA-valLFM2.5-VL-3B by 7.776.684.3+7.7
- MMMBLFM2.5-VL-3B by 6.776.383+6.7
- Multilingual MMMBLFM2.5-VL-3B by 6.776.383+6.7
- ScreenSpot-v2 MobileInternVL3_5-2B by 586.281.2+5
- SimpleVQALFM2.5-VL-3B by 4.930.535.4+4.9
- MMBenchLFM2.5-VL-3B by 4.876.281+4.8
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)InternVL3_5-2B by 3.65248.4+3.6
- DocVQA-valLFM2.5-VL-3B by 2.788.491.1+2.7
- ScreenSpot-v2 WebLFM2.5-VL-3B by 2.379.982.2+2.3
- SEED-Bench (image)LFM2.5-VL-3B by 2.375.477.7+2.3
- OCRBench v2_enLFM2.5-VL-3B by 245.547.5+2
- ScreenSpot-v2 DesktopInternVL3_5-2B by 1.279.978.7+1.2
- InfographicVQA (val)tie69.370.2tie
- POPEtie8888.7tie
- MMEtie73.673.1tie
- ChartQA Testtie81.781.3tie
- HallusionBenchtie47.647.2tie
- OCRBench v1tie83.984.2tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, InternVL3_5-2B or LFM2.5-VL-3B?
LFM2.5-VL-3B wins all two areas where both have results: images and charts and following instructions. InternVL3_5-2B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 28 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 6 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 22 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.