Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5 4B

Liquid AI

Wins 1 of 1 area

Images and charts

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

LFM3-VL-2B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 29 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

LFM3-VL-2BNo current price is tracked.
Qwen3.5 4B$0.03 to read · $0.15 to write$0.18Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where LFM3-VL-2B pulls ahead

  • Math problems shown in pictures and chartsMathVista+20.6points aheadLFM3-VL-2B84.2Qwen3.5 4B63.6
  • Questions that truly need the image to answerMMStar+15.1points aheadLFM3-VL-2B74.4Qwen3.5 4B59.3
  • Visual perception tasks people solve at a glanceBLINK+12.4points aheadLFM3-VL-2B71.1Qwen3.5 4B58.7

Where Qwen3.5 4B pulls ahead

  • Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+19.7points aheadQwen3.5 4B65.4LFM3-VL-2B45.7

Every test, side by side

All 29 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

Images and chartsLFM3-VL-2B
  • MathVistaLFM3-VL-2B by 20.684.263.6+20.6
  • MMMU-ProQwen3.5 4B by 19.745.765.4+19.7
  • MMStarLFM3-VL-2B by 15.174.459.3+15.1
  • BLINKLFM3-VL-2B by 12.471.158.7+12.4

Full images and charts ranking

Other results25 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or Qwen3.5 4B?

LFM3-VL-2B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. Qwen3.5 4B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 29 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 25 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.