VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

MiMo V2.5 Pro vs MiMo V2.6 Flash RL

7 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 7 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 0 and MiMo V2.6 Flash RL on 7. The widest gap is DeepSWE 1.1, where MiMo V2.6 Flash RL scores 67.9 against 19. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $0.43 per million input tokens).

XIAOMIVSXIAOMI7 SHARED07 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerXiaomiXiaomi
Released
Price per 1M tokens input / output$0.43 / $0.87$0.14 / $0.28
Cost of 1M in + 1M out$1.30$0.42 3.1× less
Head-to-head of 7 shared benchmarks0 wins7 wins
Scores tracked independently verified101 49 0

Release dates: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; the Hugging Face repository date for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; deepinfra for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaMiMo V2.5 ProWINSMiMo V2.6 Flash RL
Coding01MiMo V2.6 Flash RL leads 1 of 1 · widest: Terminal-Bench 2.1 65.2 vs 87.6

Biggest gaps

MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on

No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.

MiMo V2.6 Flash RL pulls furthest ahead on

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.187.6 vs 65.2

Every shared benchmark7 · grouped by area

Other shared benchmarks 6

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, deepinfra), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare MiMo V2.5 Pro withALL PAIRINGS →