Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
37 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 37 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on 37 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 0. The widest gap is Program Bench, where Claude Opus 4.8 scores 71.9 against 12.5. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $5.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for Claude Opus 4.8; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Claude Opus 4.8 pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination60.7 vs 10.8
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking34.2 vs 9.9
- SimpleQA Verified53 vs 16.1
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
Every shared benchmark37 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 6
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Multimodal 2
Other shared benchmarks 15
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.