MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5
30 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 30 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 0 and Claude Opus 5 on 30. The widest gap is Program Bench, where Claude Opus 5 scores 85.4 against 12.5. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $5.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; the vendor's own announcement for Claude Opus 5. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; Artificial Analysis for Claude Opus 5. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
Claude Opus 5 pulls furthest ahead on
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking38.6 vs 9.9
- SimpleQA Verified59.9 vs 16.1
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination39.3 vs 10.8
Every shared benchmark30 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 5
Agentic 3
Factuality 3
Long Context 1
Multimodal 3
Other shared benchmarks 12
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.