DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
38 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 38 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores higher on 28 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 9, with 1 level. The widest gap is τ-Bench V3 · Banking, where DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores 39.4 against 9.9. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $0.44 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for DeepSeek-V4-Flash; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
DeepSeek-V4-Flash pulls furthest ahead on
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking39.4 vs 9.9
- Humanity's Last Exam38.6 vs 14.8
- LiveCodeBench v690.6 vs 39.6
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- AA IT-Bench SRE38.2 vs 31.5
- SWE-bench Pro57.2 vs 52.6
- LMArena · WebDev1437 vs 1431
Every shared benchmark38 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Other shared benchmarks 17
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.