GLM-5.2 vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
36 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 36 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.2 scores higher on 34 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 2. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination, where GLM-5.2 scores 73.7 against 10.8. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $1.40 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Z.ai's own price page for GLM-5.2; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
GLM-5.2 pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination73.7 vs 10.8
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking34.6 vs 9.9
- Humanity's Last Exam41.1 vs 14.8
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
Every shared benchmark36 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 5
Agentic 5
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Other shared benchmarks 16
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (zai-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.