MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max
35 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 35 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 2 and Qwen3.7 Max on 33. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination, where Qwen3.7 Max scores 74.4 against 10.8. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $2.50 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; Alibaba's own price page for Qwen3.7 Max. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
Qwen3.7 Max pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination74.4 vs 10.8
- SimpleQA Verified55.8 vs 16.1
- Humanity's Last Exam40.5 vs 14.8
Every shared benchmark35 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Other shared benchmarks 14
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.