Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
37 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 37 shared benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 scores higher on 36 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 1. The widest gap is Program Bench, where Claude Fable 5 scores 86.3 against 12.5. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $10.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Anthropic's own price page for Claude Fable 5; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Claude Fable 5 pulls furthest ahead on
- SimpleQA Verified70.7 vs 16.1
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking38.1 vs 9.9
- Humanity's Last Exam55.5 vs 14.8
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.
Every shared benchmark37 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 6
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Multimodal 2
Other shared benchmarks 17
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.