MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
35 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 35 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 13 and Qwen3.6 Plus on 22. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination, where Qwen3.6 Plus scores 65.4 against 10.8. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $0.50 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; Alibaba's own price page for Qwen3.6 Plus. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- GDPVal30.4 vs 23.8
- SciCode50.6 vs 40.7
- Terminal-Bench 2.165.2 vs 61.4
Qwen3.6 Plus pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination65.4 vs 10.8
- SimpleQA Verified44.1 vs 16.1
- LiveCodeBench v687.1 vs 39.6
Every shared benchmark35 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 2
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Multimodal 3
Other shared benchmarks 13
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.