Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
36 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 36 shared benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B scores higher on 13 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 22, with 1 level. The widest gap is GDPVal, where MiMo V2.5 Pro scores 30.4 against 5.3. Gemma 4 31B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $0.43 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for Gemma 4 31B; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Gemma 4 31B pulls furthest ahead on
- LiveCodeBench v680 vs 39.6
- IFBench75.6 vs 42.7
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination18.1 vs 10.8
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- GDPVal30.4 vs 5.3
- SWE-bench Pro57.2 vs 35.7
- SimpleQA Verified16.1 vs 10.4
Every shared benchmark36 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Multimodal 3
Other shared benchmarks 12
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.