MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
39 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 39 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 15 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on 23, with 1 level. The widest gap is AA ApexAgents, where Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores 15.3 against 2.4. MiMo V2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $0.60 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; Artificial Analysis for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- GDPVal30.4 vs 14
- Terminal-Bench 2.165.2 vs 51.3
- SciCode50.6 vs 44.8
Qwen3.5 397B A17B pulls furthest ahead on
- AA ApexAgents15.3 vs 2.4
- LiveCodeBench v683.6 vs 39.6
- Humanity's Last Exam29 vs 14.8
Every shared benchmark39 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 5
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Multimodal 2
Other shared benchmarks 15
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.