Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
39 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 39 shared benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B scores higher on 10 and MiMo V2.5 Pro on 29. The widest gap is SWE-bench Verified, where MiMo V2.5 Pro scores 78.9 against 17.4. Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.13 against $0.43 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for Gemma 4 26B A4B; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Gemma 4 26B A4B pulls furthest ahead on
- LiveCodeBench v677.1 vs 39.6
- IFBench72.4 vs 42.7
- AA-LCR65.7 vs 41.7
MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- SWE-bench Verified78.9 vs 17.4
- SWE-bench Pro57.2 vs 13.8
- Terminal-Bench 2.165.2 vs 39
Every shared benchmark39 · grouped by area
Reasoning 3
Coding 7
Agentic 3
Factuality 2
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 2
Multimodal 3
Other shared benchmarks 17
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.