MiMo V2.5 Pro vs North-Mini-Code-1.0
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
MiMo V2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30MiMo V2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software42MiMo V2.5 Pro4 of 6 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20MiMo V2.5 Pro2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20MiMo V2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10MiMo V2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10MiMo V2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+58.5points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+42.4points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+29.6points ahead
Where North-Mini-Code-1.0 pulls ahead
- Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+30.7points ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+1.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMiMo V2.5 Pro
- LiveCodeBench v6North-Mini-Code-1.0 by 30.739.670.3+30.7
- Terminal-Bench 2.1MiMo V2.5 Pro by 29.665.235.6+29.6
- SWE-bench ProMiMo V2.5 Pro by 1757.240.2+17
- Terminal-Bench HardMiMo V2.5 Pro by 12.143.231.1+12.1
- SciCodeMiMo V2.5 Pro by 11.850.638.8+11.8
- SWE-bench VerifiedNorth-Mini-Code-1.0 by 1.378.980.2+1.3
AgentsMiMo V2.5 Pro
- GDPValMiMo V2.5 Pro by 31.231.20+31.2
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingMiMo V2.5 Pro by 3.59.96.4+3.5
- Terminal-Bench 4.0tie00.5tie
ReasoningMiMo V2.5 Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamMiMo V2.5 Pro by 24.635.711.1+24.6
- GPQA DiamondMiMo V2.5 Pro by 10.986.675.7+10.9
- CritPtMiMo V2.5 Pro by 3.740.3+3.7
FactsMiMo V2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMiMo V2.5 Pro by 58.575.316.8+58.5
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMiMo V2.5 Pro by 3.522.418.9+3.5
Following instructionsMiMo V2.5 Pro
- IFBenchMiMo V2.5 Pro by 22.379.957.6+22.3
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)MiMo V2.5 Pro by 56.894.237.4+56.8
- AA-OmniscienceMiMo V2.5 Pro by 51.93.3-48.6+51.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMiMo V2.5 Pro by 23.760.236.5+23.7
- AA IntelligenceMiMo V2.5 Pro by 16.1269.9+16.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.0MiMo V2.5 Pro by 13.368.455.1+13.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, MiMo V2.5 Pro or North-Mini-Code-1.0?
MiMo V2.5 Pro wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. North-Mini-Code-1.0 wins none.
Which is better for coding?
MiMo V2.5 Pro. It wins 4 of the 6 coding tests both models report; North-Mini-Code-1.0 wins 2.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 16 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.