Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
⌘K
UTC
Models741Deals30d271Policy30d66, 14 pendingSources1,015

Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.7 Plus Preview

Meta · released

Wins 2 of 7 areas

Agents · Long documents

Alibaba · released

Wins 4 of 7 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts · Following instructions

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins more areas, narrowly.Muse Glimmer is cheaper and better at agents.

Scores updated · 25 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Muse Glimmer$0.33 to read · $1.35 to write$1.68Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview$0.40 to read · $1.60 to write$2.00Price from Alibaba's own price page

Muse Glimmer costs 16% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.7 Plus Preview pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+54.2points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview72.3Muse Glimmer18.1
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+13.6points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview35.6Muse Glimmer22
  • Reads and reasons about text in imagesOCRBenchv2+10.2points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview67.1Muse Glimmer56.9

Where Muse Glimmer pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+10.3points aheadMuse Glimmer83.3Qwen3.7 Plus Preview73
  • Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+6points aheadMuse Glimmer23.5Qwen3.7 Plus Preview17.5
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.5points aheadMuse Glimmer27Qwen3.7 Plus Preview22.5

Every test, side by side

All 25 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full coding ranking

AgentsMuse Glimmer

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsMuse Glimmer
  • AA-LCRMuse Glimmer by 10.383.373+10.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
  • IFBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 17778+1

Full following instructions ranking

Other results6 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.7 Plus Preview?

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, images and charts and following instructions. Muse Glimmer wins agents and long documents, and costs 16% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview. It wins 4 of the 4 coding tests both models report; Muse Glimmer wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Muse Glimmer costs $0.33 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs $0.40 and $1.60. That makes Muse Glimmer about 16% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 25 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 19 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 6 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.