Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Wins 0 of 3 areas
—
Wins 3 of 3 areas
Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the three areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Agents and reasoning rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pulls ahead
- Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+60.8points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+25.2points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+18.1points ahead
Where Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
AgentsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- OSWorld-VerifiedQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 60.85.966.7+60.8
ReasoningQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 25.24671.2+25.2
Images and chartsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 18.149.567.6+18.1
- MathVistaQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 10.274.784.9+10.2
- LMArena · VisionQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 95 rating points11521247+95 rating
- MMStarQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 8.969.578.4+8.9
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MATH-VisionQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 28.138.466.5+28.1
- ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 22.639.462+22.6
- LVBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 18.74967.7+18.7
- MMLU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1368.881.8+13
- CharadesSTAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 10.654.264.8+10.6
- OCRBench v2_enQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 9.957.267.1+9.9
- ScreenSpotQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 6.988.595.4+6.9
- CC-OCRQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 5.177.182.2+5.1
- OCRBench v2 (Chinese)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 2.759.161.8+2.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins all three areas where both have results: agents, reasoning and images and charts. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 6 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.