Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Reasoning · Long documents
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Facts · Following instructions
The two are evenly matched.Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is better at reasoning and long documents; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at facts and following instructions.
Scores updated · 27 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct2 of 2 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct1 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 33% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+20points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+2.6points ahead
- Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+2.3points ahead
Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pulls ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+5.2points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+3points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 27 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- SciCodeQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 5.230.735.9+5.2
- LiveCodeBench v6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 2.356.654.3+2.3
- Terminal-Bench Hardtie7.66.8tie
ReasoningQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 2.673.871.2+2.6
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 17.66.6+1
- CritPttie00tie
FactsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 317.320.3+3
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.17.38.4+1.1
Long documentsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- AA-LCRQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 2052.732.7+20
Following instructionsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- IFBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 339.742.7+3
Other results16 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 13.521.635.1+13.5
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 6.8-59.5-52.7+6.8
- Arena-Hard-V2Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 5.382.777.4+5.3
- AIME 2025Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 5.269.574.7+5.2
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.914.219.1+4.9
- HMMT 2025Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.354.157.4+3.3
- BFCL v3Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 2.670.367.7+2.6
- MultiPL-EQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 1.787.886.1+1.7
- SuperGPQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.658.860.4+1.6
- MMLU-ReduxQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.390.992.2+1.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.215.316.5+1.2
- MMLU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.280.681.8+1.2
- IncludeQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.178.980+1.1
- MMLU-ProXQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.176.777.8+1.1
- AA Intelligencetie9.69.9tie
- IFEvaltie87.687.8tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct each win two of the six areas where both have results. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins reasoning and long documents; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins facts and following instructions. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 33% less. They are level on coding and agents.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 3 both models report, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.40 and $1.60. That makes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct about 33% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 27 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 16 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.