Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Agents
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Apodex 1.1 is cheaper and better at agents.
Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video01Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own21Apodex 1.12 of 4 tests · 1 tie
Images and charts and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Apodex 1.1 costs 76% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+27.5points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+23.2points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+13.2points ahead
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+20points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+3.8points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Pro
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Pro by 13.245.558.7+13.2
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 4.169.773.8+4.1
AgentsApodex 1.1
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 2034.614.6+20
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 3.1 Pro by 404+4
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingApodex 1.1 by 3.825.221.4+3.8
- AA ApexAgentstie31.232tie
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Pro by 13.14.617.7+13.1
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Pro by 12.934.147+12.9
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Pro by 7.786.494.1+7.7
FactsGemini 3.1 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3.1 Pro by 27.521.649.1+27.5
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Pro by 23.231.754.9+23.2
Images and chartsGemini 3.1 Pro
- MMMU-ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.279.282.4+3.2
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Pro by 53.8-21.931.9+53.8
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 26.336.610.3+26.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Pro by 860.868.8+8
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.326.429.7+3.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, images and charts and long documents. Apodex 1.1 wins agents, and costs 76% less.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Apodex 1.1 wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Apodex 1.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $12.00. That makes Apodex 1.1 about 76% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.