Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct
Wins 6 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.5 Haiku2 of 2 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
Agents, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+56points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+19.4points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+18.8points ahead
Where Gemma 3n E4B Instruct pulls ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.5 Haiku
- SciCodeClaude 3.5 Haiku by 18.827.48.6+18.8
- Terminal-Bench Hardtie2.32.3tie
ReasoningEven
- GPQA DiamondClaude 3.5 Haiku by 11.240.829.6+11.2
- Humanity's Last ExamGemma 3n E4B Instruct by 1.23.64.8+1.2
- CritPttie00tie
FactsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 5658.92.9+56
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.5 Haiku by 5.213.28+5.2
Images and chartsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- MMMU-ProClaude 3.5 Haiku by 19.445.626.2+19.4
Following instructionsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- IFBenchClaude 3.5 Haiku by 14.942.827.9+14.9
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 58.8-22.5-81.3+58.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.5 Haiku by 19.624.65+19.6
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.5 Haiku by 12.715.93.2+12.7
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 3.18.95.8+3.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemma 3n E4B Instruct?
Claude 3.5 Haiku wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Gemma 3n E4B Instruct wins none. They are level on reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemma 3n E4B Instruct wins none, and 1 is a tie.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.