Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Wins 7 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Qwen3.5 Omni Plus2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Qwen3.5 Omni Plus2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Qwen3.5 Omni Plus2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01Qwen3.5 Omni Plus1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video01Qwen3.5 Omni Plus1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Qwen3.5 Omni Plus1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Qwen3.5 Omni Plus1 of 1 test
Agents, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.5 Omni Plus pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+41.8points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+36.4points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+24.9points ahead
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 18.92.321.2+18.9
- SciCodeQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 13.127.440.5+13.1
ReasoningQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- GPQA DiamondQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 41.840.882.6+41.8
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 11.33.614.9+11.3
- CritPttie00.6tie
FactsQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 4.213.217.4+4.2
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 4.158.963+4.1
Images and chartsQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- MMMU-ProQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 24.945.670.5+24.9
Long documentsQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- AA-LCRQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 36.427.363.7+36.4
Following instructionsQwen3.5 Omni Plus
- IFBenchQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 8.442.851.2+8.4
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by 63.724.688.3+63.7
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 50.91.952.8+50.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 11.715.927.6+11.7
- AA IntelligenceQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 11.58.920.4+11.5
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3.5 Omni Plus by 9.4-22.5-13.1+9.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3.5 Omni Plus?
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.