Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Long documents
Wins 3 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B wins more areas, narrowly.Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at long documents.
Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B2 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video01Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked00Even0 each · 1 tie
Agents, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+31.8points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+14.6points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+3.9points ahead
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+47.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3 Omni 30B A3B
- SciCodeQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 3.227.430.6+3.2
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 1.52.33.8+1.5
ReasoningQwen3 Omni 30B A3B
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 31.840.872.6+31.8
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 3.93.67.5+3.9
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 47.958.911+47.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 1.413.214.6+1.4
Images and chartsQwen3 Omni 30B A3B
- MMMU-ProQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 14.645.660.2+14.6
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 38.9-22.5-61.4+38.9
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3 Omni 30B A3B by 8.71.910.6+8.7
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.5 Haiku by 3.324.621.3+3.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.5 Haiku by 3.215.912.7+3.2
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 1.18.97.8+1.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B wins three of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and images and charts. Claude 3.5 Haiku wins long documents. They are level on agents, facts and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.