Claude 3 Haiku vs Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Facts
Wins 6 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper and better at facts.
Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video01Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up10Claude 3 Haiku1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
Agents, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Claude 3 Haiku costs 46% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+38.6points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+32points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+31.1points ahead
Where Claude 3 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+12.8points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- SciCodeNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 17.618.636.2+17.6
- Terminal-Bench HardNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 3.70.84.5+3.7
AgentsNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- GDPValNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 14.1014.1+14.1
ReasoningNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- GPQA DiamondNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 38.637.476+38.6
- Humanity's Last ExamNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 2.94.17+2.9
- CritPttie00tie
FactsClaude 3 Haiku
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3 Haiku by 12.819.56.7+12.8
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie17.617.7tie
Images and chartsNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- MMMU-ProNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 31.130.861.9+31.1
Long documentsNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- AA-LCRNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 3227.759.7+32
Following instructionsNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium
- IFBenchNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 30.136.166.2+30.1
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 59.321.180.4+59.3
- AA Agentic IndexNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 31.2738.2+31.2
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3 Haiku by 10.5-48.6-59.1+10.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 8.46.715.1+8.4
- AA IntelligenceNova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium by 85.613.6+8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium?
Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3 Haiku wins facts, and costs 46% less.
Which is better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3 Haiku wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Nova 2.0 Omni Reasoning Medium costs $0.30 and $2.50. That makes Claude 3 Haiku about 46% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.