Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or HyperNova 60B 2605 (high, based on gpt-oss-120b)?

Refresh Models —Deals —Regulatory —Sources —

Claude Fable 5 vs HyperNova 60B 2605 (high, based on gpt-oss-120b)

17 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 17 shared benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 scores higher on 16 and HyperNova 60B 2605 (high, based on gpt-oss-120b) on 1. The widest gap is AA Agentic Index, where Claude Fable 5 scores 56.6 against 6.8.

ANTHROPICVSOPENAI17 SHARED16–1 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MARGINHyperNova 60B 2605 (high, based on gpt-oss-120b)

AA Agentic Index56.66.8

AA Intelligence62.118.3

AA-LCR76.735.3

AA-Omniscience43.3-54.6

Artificial Analysis Coding Index76.523.2

critpt28.60.9

gdpval61.18

GPQA Diamond92.673.3

HLE64.516.6

IFBench63.566.5

OmniScience Accuracy65.315.2

OmniScience Non-Hallucination36.417.7

scicode60.233

TauBench V3 - Banking38.15.6

Terminal-Bench 2.18818.4

Terminal-Bench Hard62.923.5

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)98.563.2

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.