Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Across 44 shared benchmarks tracked on Vector Wire, Claude Fable 5 leads on 42 and Qwen3.7 Max leads on 2 — Claude Fable 5 leads on more. Strengths differ by axis; the table below shows every head-to-head number with provenance.

SEEDRefresh Models —Deals —Regulatory —Sources —

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

AnthropicvsAlibaba44 shared benchmarks42–2 head-to-head

Benchmark	Claude Fable 5	Qwen3.7 Max
AA Agentic Index	56.6	30.9
AA Intelligence	62.1	46.7
AA-LCR	76.7	74.7
AA-Omniscience	43.3	13.5
AndroidBench	84.5	56.5
arena_elo	1508	1474
arena_text_factuality	1486	1479
Artificial Analysis Coding Index	76.5	66
coding_arena_elo	1626	1517
critpt	28.6	13.4
DeepSWE	70	18
DeepSWE 1.1	70	21.6
Finance Agent v2	56.3	48.4
gdpval	61.9	38.5
GPQA Diamond	92.6	92.4
HLE	64.5	41.4
HLE (with tools)	64.5	53.5
IFBench	63.5	80.5
JobBench	57.4	31.3
livebench	78.3	74.3
livebench_agentic_coding	62.2	43.6
livebench_coding	86	74.2
livebench_data_analysis	80.5	71.8
livebench_instruction_following	75.8	74
livebench_language	90.7	79.7
livebench_math	96	85.3
livebench_reasoning	89.7	83.3
MCP Atlas	84.7	76.4
MLS Bench Lite	49.9	31.7
OmniScience Accuracy	65.3	31.1
OmniScience Non-Hallucination	36.4	74.4
PaperBench	88.8	64.8
scicode	60.2	53.5
simplebench	81.9	70.4
simpleqa_verified	68.3	58.5
SWE-bench Multilingual	86.6	78.3
SWE-bench Pro	80	60.6
SWE-bench Verified	95	80.4
TauBench V3 - Banking	38.1	11.8
Terminal-Bench 2.1	88	75
Terminal-Bench Hard	62.9	50.8
WideSearch	81.2	75.2
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)	98.5	94.7
τ³-Bench	26.8	10.9

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.