Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
19 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 19 shared benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 scores higher on 11 and MiMo V2.6 Pro on 8. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience, where Claude Fable 5 scores 43.3 against 8.4. MiMo V2.6 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $10.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Anthropic's own price page for Claude Fable 5; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Claude Fable 5 pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracy65.3 vs 34.9
- Terminal-Bench 4.042.4 vs 34.8
- Humanity's Last Exam55.5 vs 49.4
MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination59.4 vs 36.4
- GDPVal58.7 vs 54.8
- Terminal-Bench 2.189.9 vs 84.6
Every shared benchmark19 · grouped by area
Reasoning 2
Coding 2
Agentic 3
Factuality 2
Long Context 1
Other shared benchmarks 9
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.