Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Haiku 5.5

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Anthropic · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Reasoning

Haiku 5.5 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 24 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Reasoning rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Haiku 4.5$1.00 to read · $5.00 to write$6.00Price from Anthropic's own price page
Haiku 5.5No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Haiku 5.5 pulls ahead

  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+47points aheadHaiku 5.557.4Claude Haiku 4.510.4
  • Long, multi-file coding tasks in real codebasesSWE-bench Pro+25.3points aheadHaiku 5.564.8Claude Haiku 4.539.5
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in many programming languagesSWE-bench Multilingual+16.3points aheadHaiku 5.583.7Claude Haiku 4.567.4

Where Claude Haiku 4.5 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 24 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingHaiku 5.5

Full coding ranking

ReasoningHaiku 5.5

Full reasoning ranking

Other results21 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • GDPval-AA 2.1Haiku 5.5 by 885 rating points7351620+885 rating
  • OSWorld 2.1Haiku 5.5 by 56.715.772.4+56.7
  • OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset)Haiku 5.5 by 56.315.772+56.3
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Haiku 5.5 by 39.2039.2+39.2
  • HealthBench Professional length-adjustedHaiku 5.5 by 32.632.264.8+32.6
  • Suicide and self-harm multi-turn appropriate response rate (API, without a system prompt)Haiku 5.5 by 244670+24
  • Suicide and self-harm multi-turn appropriate response rate (Claude.ai)Haiku 5.5 by 197190+19
  • Election integrity multi-turn (appropriate response rate) - Claude.aiHaiku 5.5 by 118798+11
  • SWE-bench MultimodalHaiku 5.5 by 10.919.830.7+10.9
  • Election integrity multi-turn (appropriate response rate) - API, without a system promptHaiku 5.5 by 69399+6
  • Child safety multi-turn appropriate response rate (API, without a system prompt)Haiku 5.5 by 19596+1
  • Child safety multi-turn appropriate response rate (Claude.ai)Haiku 5.5 by 19899+1
  • Child safety single-turn harmful prompts decline rate (API)tie99.999.3tie
  • Election integrity single-turn benign requests (refusal rate) - API, without a system prompttie00.3tie
  • Election integrity single-turn benign requests (refusal rate) - Claude.aitie00.3tie
  • Election integrity single-turn harmful requests (harmless rate) - API, without a system prompttie99.8100tie
  • Election integrity single-turn harmful requests (harmless rate) - Claude.aitie99.8100tie
  • Suicide and self-harm single-turn benign requests refusal rate (Claude.ai)tie0.60.4tie
  • Suicide and self-harm single-turn requests posing potential risk harmless rate (Claude.ai)tie99.8100tie
  • Suicide and self-harm single-turn requests posing potential risk harmless rate (API, without a system prompt)tie99.599.6tie
  • Suicide and self-harm single-turn benign requests refusal rate (API, without a system prompt)tie00tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Haiku 5.5?

Haiku 5.5 wins all two areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Haiku 5.5. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude Haiku 4.5 wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 24 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 21 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.