Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025

Anthropic · released

Wins 7 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Google · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Claude Opus 4.8 is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 is cheaper.

Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Opus 4.8$5.00 to read · $25.00 to write$30Price from Anthropic's own price page
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025$0.10 to read · $0.40 to write$0.50Price from Artificial Analysis

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 costs 98% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Opus 4.8 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+48.5points aheadClaude Opus 4.860.7Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-202512.2
  • Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+45.4points aheadClaude Opus 4.858.3Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-202512.9
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+41.7points aheadClaude Opus 4.848.7Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-20257

Where Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Opus 4.8

Full coding ranking

AgentsClaude Opus 4.8
  • GDPValClaude Opus 4.8 by 30.247.817.6+30.2

Full agents ranking

ReasoningClaude Opus 4.8

Full reasoning ranking

FactsClaude Opus 4.8

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsClaude Opus 4.8

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsClaude Opus 4.8
  • AA-LCRClaude Opus 4.8 by 1377.764.7+13

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsClaude Opus 4.8
  • IFBenchClaude Opus 4.8 by 9.662.252.6+9.6

Full following instructions ranking

Other results5 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025?

Claude Opus 4.8 wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins none, but costs 98% less.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.8. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 costs $0.10 and $0.40. That makes Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 about 98% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.