Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 6 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 19 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Sonnet 4.5$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.6 Max Preview$1.30 to read · $7.80 to write$9.10Price from Alibaba's own price page

Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs 49% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.6 Max Preview pulls ahead

  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+29.7points aheadQwen3.6 Max Preview50.2Claude Sonnet 4.520.5
  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+21.3points aheadQwen3.6 Max Preview52Claude Sonnet 4.530.7
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+19.3points aheadQwen3.6 Max Preview76.6Claude Sonnet 4.557.3

Where Claude Sonnet 4.5 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 19 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.6 Max Preview

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3.6 Max Preview
  • GDPValQwen3.6 Max Preview by 29.720.550.2+29.7

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.6 Max Preview

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen3.6 Max Preview

Full facts ranking

Long documentsQwen3.6 Max Preview
  • AA-LCRQwen3.6 Max Preview by 8.472.380.7+8.4

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.6 Max Preview
  • IFBenchQwen3.6 Max Preview by 19.357.376.6+19.3

Full following instructions ranking

Other results6 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs $1.30 and $7.80. That makes Qwen3.6 Max Preview about 49% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 19 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 6 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.