Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-V3.2 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

DeepSeek · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Agents · Long documents

DeepSeek · released

Wins 3 of 6 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Following instructions

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale wins more areas, narrowly.DeepSeek-V3.2 is cheaper and better at agents.

Scores updated · 23 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V3.2$0.28 to read · $0.42 to write$0.70Price from Artificial Analysis
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale$0.29 to read · $0.43 to write$0.72Price from deepseek

DeepSeek-V3.2 costs 3% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale pulls ahead

  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+5.1points aheadDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale44DeepSeek-V3.238.9
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.8points aheadDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale37.8DeepSeek-V3.233
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+4.5points aheadDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale7.4DeepSeek-V3.22.9

Where DeepSeek-V3.2 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+6.5points aheadDeepSeek-V3.217.3DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale10.8
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+3.3points aheadDeepSeek-V3.273.3DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale70

Every test, side by side

All 23 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Full coding ranking

AgentsDeepSeek-V3.2
  • GDPValDeepSeek-V3.2 by 9.89.80+9.8

Full agents ranking

ReasoningDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsDeepSeek-V3.2
  • AA-LCRDeepSeek-V3.2 by 3.373.370+3.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
  • IFBenchDeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale by 3.260.763.9+3.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale wins three of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and following instructions. DeepSeek-V3.2 wins agents and long documents, and costs 3% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale. It wins 1 of the 3 coding tests both models report; DeepSeek-V3.2 wins none, and 2 are ties.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V3.2 costs $0.28 per million input tokens and $0.42 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.29 and $0.43. That makes DeepSeek-V3.2 about 3% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 23 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.