Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or GLM-5.3?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3

26 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 26 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores higher on 16 and GLM-5.3 on 10. The widest gap is HLE, where GLM-5.3 scores 62.5 against 39.2. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.30 against $1.40 per million input tokens).

DEEPSEEKVSZ.AI26 SHARED16–10 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMARGINGLM-5.3

AA Intelligence4045

AA-LCR8479.7

AA-Omniscience-5.314.3

critpt14.319.1

cybergym88.184.5

DeepSWE 1.174.266.9

gdpval56.658.4

GPQA Diamond90.991.7

HLE39.262.5

HLE (with tools)63.962.5

livebench_agentic_coding77.360.9

livebench_coding8079

livebench_data_analysis79.370.2

livebench_instruction_following7069.3

livebench_language81.279.9

livebench_math93.387.9

livebench_reasoning86.785.8

nl2repo6458

OmniScience Accuracy46.433.9

OmniScience Non-Hallucination3.570.4

Program Bench20.319

scicode51.959

Terminal-Bench 2.190.688.2

Terminal-bench 3.03028.3

Terminal-Bench 4.031.241.8

terminalbenchV4026.841.9

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, zai-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.