Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Qwen3.5 2B?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Qwen3.5 2B

21 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 21 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro scores higher on 20 and Qwen3.5 2B on 1. The widest gap is HLE, where DeepSeek-V4-Pro scores 48.2 against 5.

DEEPSEEKVSALIBABA21 SHARED20–1 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProMARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index63.30.8

AA Intelligence536.9

AA-LCR74.725.6

AA-Omniscience-10.6-60.2

Artificial Analysis Coding Index59.42.9

critpt130

gdpval54.60

Global-MMLU-Lite89.364.5

GPQA Diamond92.451.6

HLE48.25

IFBench76.541.3

MMLU-Pro87.566.5

multichallenge64.133.7

OmniScience Accuracy438.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination12.225.8

scicode50.87.2

TauBench V3 - Banking30.12.5

Terminal-Bench 2.187.93

Terminal-Bench Hard46.23.8

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)96.281.6

τ³-Bench25.96.2

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare DeepSeek-V4-Pro withALL PAIRINGS →

DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek-V3.2 DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldDeepSeek-V3 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.5 o3 GPT-5.1 Claude Opus 5 Gemma 4 26B A4B Kimi K3