Refresh Models —Deals —Regulatory —Sources —

o3 vs Qwen3.5 2B

23 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 23 shared benchmarks, o3 scores higher on 21 and Qwen3.5 2B on 2. The widest gap is Terminal-Bench Hard, where o3 scores 37.1 against 3.8.

OPENAIVSALIBABA23 SHARED21–2 HEAD-TO-HEAD

Benchmarko3MARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index36.10.8

AA Intelligence30.46.9

AA-LCR74.725.6

AA-Omniscience-15.3-60.2

AIME 202491.617

AIME 202589.219

Artificial Analysis Coding Index38.42.9

GPQA Diamond83.351.6

HLE20.35

IFBench71.441.3

longbench_v258.838.7

math_500_em98.181.5

MathVista86.848.7

multichallenge60.433.7

OmniScience Accuracy38.68.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination12.925.8

Terminal-Bench Hard37.13.8

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)80.781.6

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare o3 withALL PAIRINGS →

OpenAIGPT-5.5 GPT-4o GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.4 GPT-5.2 GPT-5

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldGPT-5.1 Claude Opus 5 Gemma 4 26B A4B Kimi K3 Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B DeepSeek-V3.2 DeepSeek-V4-Flash Claude Opus 4.7