Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Qwen3.5 2B?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Qwen3.5 2B

21 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 21 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores higher on 20 and Qwen3.5 2B on 1. The widest gap is HLE, where DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores 38.6 against 5.

DEEPSEEKVSALIBABA21 SHARED20–1 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-FlashMARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index61.30.8

AA Intelligence49.96.9

AA-LCR79.725.6

AA-Omniscience-14.3-60.2

Artificial Analysis Coding Index69.12.9

critpt16.60

gdpval52.90

Global-MMLU-Lite88.464.5

GPQA Diamond90.851.6

HLE38.65

IFBench79.241.3

MMLU-Pro86.466.5

MMMU-Pro74.843

OmniScience Accuracy40.48.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination15.625.8

scicode50.37.2

TauBench V3 - Banking39.42.5

Terminal-Bench 2.182.73

Terminal-Bench Hard38.63.8

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)95.681.6

τ³-Bench26.76.2

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare DeepSeek-V4-Flash withALL PAIRINGS →

DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek-V3.2

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldClaude Opus 4.7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 1.5 Pro Claude Sonnet 4 Claude Sonnet 5 Muse Spark 1.1 GLM-5.1 GLM-5.2