Gemini 3.1 Pro vs North-Mini-Code-1.0
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software50Gemini 3.1 Pro5 of 6 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+44.7points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+38.2points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+36points ahead
Where North-Mini-Code-1.0 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 38.273.835.6+38.2
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3.1 Pro by 22.753.831.1+22.7
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3.1 Pro by 21.491.770.3+21.4
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Pro by 19.958.738.8+19.9
- SWE-bench ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 1454.240.2+14
- SWE-bench Verifiedtie80.680.2tie
AgentsGemini 3.1 Pro
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingGemini 3.1 Pro by 1521.46.4+15
- GDPValGemini 3.1 Pro by 14.714.70+14.7
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 3.1 Pro by 3.540.5+3.5
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Pro by 35.94711.1+35.9
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Pro by 18.494.175.7+18.4
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Pro by 17.417.70.3+17.4
FactsGemini 3.1 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Pro by 3654.918.9+36
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3.1 Pro by 32.349.116.8+32.3
Following instructionsGemini 3.1 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 3.1 Pro by 19.577.157.6+19.5
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Pro by 80.531.9-48.6+80.5
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 58.295.637.4+58.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Pro by 32.368.836.5+32.3
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Pro by 19.829.79.9+19.8
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Gemini 3.1 Pro by 13.468.555.1+13.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or North-Mini-Code-1.0?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. North-Mini-Code-1.0 wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro. It wins 5 of the 6 coding tests both models report; North-Mini-Code-1.0 wins none, and 1 is a tie.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 16 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.