Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Google · released

Wins 5 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Math

NVIDIA · released

Wins 1 of 7 areas

Long documents

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger all-rounder.Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is cheaper and better at long documents.

Both rank among the ten best models we track in following instructions.

Scores updated · 34 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemini 3.5 Flash$1.50 to read · $9.00 to write$11Price from Artificial Analysis
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B$0.60 to read · $2.50 to write$3.10Price from Artificial Analysis

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs 70% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemini 3.5 Flash pulls ahead

  • Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+38.9points aheadGemini 3.5 Flash83.6Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B44.7
  • Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+35points aheadGemini 3.5 Flash76.7Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B41.7
  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+33.8points aheadGemini 3.5 Flash66.2Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B32.4

Where Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+32.5points aheadNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B70.3Gemini 3.5 Flash37.8
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+6points aheadNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B79.3Gemini 3.5 Flash73.3
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+5.1points aheadNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B81.4Gemini 3.5 Flash76.3

Every test, side by side

All 34 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGemini 3.5 Flash

Full coding ranking

AgentsGemini 3.5 Flash
  • MCP AtlasGemini 3.5 Flash by 38.983.644.7+38.9
  • τ-Bench V3 · BankingGemini 3.5 Flash by 1832.214.2+18
  • GDPValGemini 3.5 Flash by 9.435.125.7+9.4
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 3.5 Flash by 6.16.60.5+6.1

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGemini 3.5 Flash

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGemini 3.5 Flash

Full facts ranking

MathGemini 3.5 Flash

Full math ranking

Long documentsNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
  • AA-LCRNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B by 673.379.3+6

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsEven

Full following instructions ranking

Other results10 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and math. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins long documents, and costs 70% less. They are level on following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash. It wins 6 of the 6 coding tests both models report; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.60 and $2.50. That makes Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B about 70% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 34 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 24 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.