Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GPT-4o vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

OpenAI · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Facts · Long documents

Alibaba · released

Wins 3 of 6 areas

Agents · Reasoning · Following instructions

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins more areas, narrowly.GPT-4o is better at facts.

Scores updated · 27 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GPT-4o$5.00 to read · $15.00 to write$20Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.15 to read · $1.20 to write$1.35Price from Alibaba's own price page

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 93% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct pulls ahead

  • Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+25.7points aheadQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct56.6GPT-4o30.9
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+21.2points aheadQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct73.8GPT-4o52.6
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+5.8points aheadQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct7.6GPT-4o1.8

Where GPT-4o pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+54.8points aheadGPT-4o62.1Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct7.3
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+6.4points aheadGPT-4o23.7Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct17.3
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+3.3points aheadGPT-4o56Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct52.7

Every test, side by side

All 27 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
  • GDPValQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 6.406.4+6.4

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGPT-4o

Full facts ranking

Long documentsGPT-4o

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
  • IFBenchQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by 3.73639.7+3.7

Full following instructions ranking

Other results16 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GPT-4o or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins three of the six areas where both have results: agents, reasoning and following instructions. GPT-4o wins facts and long documents. They are level on coding.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 3 both models report, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

GPT-4o costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.15 and $1.20. That makes Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct about 93% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 27 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 16 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.