Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark 1.1

OpenAI · released

Wins 3 of 8 areas

Reasoning · Math · Long documents

Meta · released

Wins 3 of 8 areas

Coding · Facts · Images and charts

The two are evenly matched.GPT-5.4 is better at reasoning and math; Muse Spark 1.1 at coding and facts.

Scores updated · 33 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GPT-5.4$2.50 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis
Muse Spark 1.1$1.25 to read · $4.25 to write$5.50Price from Artificial Analysis

Muse Spark 1.1 costs 69% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Muse Spark 1.1 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+41.7points aheadMuse Spark 1.150GPT-5.48.3
  • Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+20.9points aheadMuse Spark 1.188.1GPT-5.467.2
  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+12.7points aheadMuse Spark 1.157.8GPT-5.445.1

Where GPT-5.4 pulls ahead

  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+8.3points aheadGPT-5.423.4Muse Spark 1.115.1
  • Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+7.8points aheadGPT-5.439.6Muse Spark 1.131.8
  • Fresh competition math problemsLiveBench · Mathematics+7.1points aheadGPT-5.494.2Muse Spark 1.187.1

Every test, side by side

All 33 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingMuse Spark 1.1

Full coding ranking

AgentsEven

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGPT-5.4

Full reasoning ranking

FactsMuse Spark 1.1

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsMuse Spark 1.1

Full images and charts ranking

MathGPT-5.4

Full math ranking

Long documentsGPT-5.4
  • AA-LCRGPT-5.4 by 4.38277.7+4.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsEven

Full following instructions ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GPT-5.4 or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark 1.1 each win three of the eight areas we test. GPT-5.4 wins reasoning, math and long documents; Muse Spark 1.1 wins coding, facts and images and charts. Muse Spark 1.1 costs 69% less. They are level on agents and following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1. It wins 4 of the 6 coding tests both models report; GPT-5.4 wins none, and 2 are ties.

Which is cheaper?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. That makes Muse Spark 1.1 about 69% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 33 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 22 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.