Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K2 Instruct

OpenAI · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Reasoning · Following instructions

Moonshot · released

Wins 3 of 6 areas

Coding · Facts · Long documents

Kimi K2 Instruct wins more areas, narrowly.gpt-oss-20b is cheaper and better at reasoning.

Scores updated · 29 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

gpt-oss-20b$0.07 to read · $0.18 to write$0.25Price from Artificial Analysis
Kimi K2 Instruct$0.60 to read · $2.50 to write$3.10Price from Artificial Analysis

gpt-oss-20b costs 92% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K2 Instruct pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+24.4points aheadKimi K2 Instruct30.3gpt-oss-20b5.9
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+18.3points aheadKimi K2 Instruct53gpt-oss-20b34.7
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+13.4points aheadKimi K2 Instruct65.8gpt-oss-20b52.4

Where gpt-oss-20b pulls ahead

  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+23.4points aheadgpt-oss-20b65.1Kimi K2 Instruct41.7
  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+14.2points aheadgpt-oss-20b28.3Kimi K2 Instruct14.1
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+8.2points aheadgpt-oss-20b38.9Kimi K2 Instruct30.7

Every test, side by side

All 29 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K2 Instruct

Full coding ranking

AgentsEven
  • GDPValKimi K2 Instruct by 18.2018.2+18.2
  • BrowseCompgpt-oss-20b by 14.228.314.1+14.2

Full agents ranking

Reasoninggpt-oss-20b

Full reasoning ranking

FactsKimi K2 Instruct

Full facts ranking

Long documentsKimi K2 Instruct
  • AA-LCRKimi K2 Instruct by 18.334.753+18.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsgpt-oss-20b
  • IFBenchgpt-oss-20b by 23.465.141.7+23.4

Full following instructions ranking

Other results15 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, gpt-oss-20b or Kimi K2 Instruct?

Kimi K2 Instruct wins three of the six areas where both have results: coding, facts and long documents. gpt-oss-20b wins reasoning and following instructions, and costs 92% less. They are level on agents.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K2 Instruct. It wins 3 of the 5 coding tests both models report; gpt-oss-20b wins 2.

Which is cheaper?

gpt-oss-20b costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Instruct costs $0.60 and $2.50. That makes gpt-oss-20b about 92% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 29 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 15 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.