Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Long documents
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Coding · Following instructions
Mistral Large 2 wins more areas, narrowly.Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is cheaper and better at long documents.
Scores updated · 22 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Mistral Large 22 of 2 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Mistral Large 21 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Llama 3.1 8B Instruct1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 99% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Mistral Large 2 pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+22.7points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+16points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+11.4points ahead
Where Llama 3.1 8B Instruct pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+24.7points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+16points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 22 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMistral Large 2
- SciCodeMistral Large 2 by 1613.229.2+16
- Terminal-Bench HardMistral Large 2 by 5.30.86.1+5.3
ReasoningEven
- GPQA DiamondMistral Large 2 by 22.725.948.6+22.7
- Humanity's Last ExamLlama 3.1 8B Instruct by 25.33.3+2
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationLlama 3.1 8B Instruct by 24.75732.3+24.7
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMistral Large 2 by 11.48.519.9+11.4
Long documentsLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
- AA-LCRLlama 3.1 8B Instruct by 16182+16
Following instructionsMistral Large 2
- IFBenchMistral Large 2 by 2.628.631.2+2.6
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AIR-Bench 2024Llama 3.1 8B Instruct by 2762.335.3+27
- naturalquestions_closedbookMistral Large 2 by 24.420.945.3+24.4
- HumanEvalMistral Large 2 by 19.472.692+19.4
- OpenBookQAMistral Large 2 by 19.27493.2+19.2
- MATHMistral Large 2 by 15.851.967.7+15.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Mistral Large 2 by 14.316.430.7+14.3
- GSM8KMistral Large 2 by 13.279.893+13.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMistral Large 2 by 8.45.413.8+8.4
- AA-OmniscienceLlama 3.1 8B Instruct by 3.5-30.9-34.4+3.5
- NarrativeQAMistral Large 2 by 2.375.677.9+2.3
- AA Intelligencetie6.97.6tie
- MMLUtie7372.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Mistral Large 2?
Mistral Large 2 wins two of the six areas where both have results: coding and following instructions. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins long documents, and costs 99% less. They are level on agents, reasoning and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Mistral Large 2. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.05 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2 costs $2.00 and $6.00. That makes Llama 3.1 8B Instruct about 99% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 22 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.