VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

MiMo V2.5 Pro vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

18 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 18 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.5 Pro scores higher on 0 and MiMo V2.6 Pro on 18. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination, where MiMo V2.6 Pro scores 59.4 against 10.8.

XIAOMIVSXIAOMI18 SHARED018 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerXiaomiXiaomi
Released
Price per 1M tokens input / output$0.43 / $0.87$0.43 / $0.87
Cost of 1M in + 1M out$1.30$1.30
Head-to-head of 18 shared benchmarks0 wins18 wins
Scores tracked independently verified101 421 1

Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.5 Pro; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaMiMo V2.5 ProWINSMiMo V2.6 Pro
Reasoning02MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 2 of 2 · widest: Humanity's Last Exam 14.8 vs 49.4
Coding02MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 2 of 2 · widest: Terminal-Bench 2.1 65.2 vs 89.9
Agentic02MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 2 of 2 · widest: GDPVal 30.4 vs 58.7
Factuality02MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 2 of 2 · widest: AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination 10.8 vs 59.4
Long Context01MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 1 of 1 · widest: AA-LCR 41.7 vs 86.3

Biggest gaps

MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls furthest ahead on

No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.

MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls furthest ahead on

  1. AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination59.4 vs 10.8
  2. Humanity's Last Exam49.4 vs 14.8
  3. AA-LCR86.3 vs 41.7

Every shared benchmark18 · grouped by area

Reasoning 2

Coding 2

Agentic 2

GDPVal30.458.7
Terminal-Bench 4.0034.8

Long Context 1

AA-LCR41.786.3

Other shared benchmarks 9

GDPval-AA 2.111071673

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare MiMo V2.5 Pro withALL PAIRINGS →