MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Claude Opus 5
19 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 19 shared benchmarks, MiMo V2.6 Pro scores higher on 8 and Claude Opus 5 on 10, with 1 level. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience, where Claude Opus 5 scores 31 against 8.4. MiMo V2.6 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $5.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro; the vendor's own announcement for Claude Opus 5. Prices: Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro; Artificial Analysis for Claude Opus 5. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination59.4 vs 39.3
- GDPVal58.7 vs 48.8
- SciCode60.9 vs 51.5
Claude Opus 5 pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracy57.1 vs 34.9
Every shared benchmark19 · grouped by area
Reasoning 2
Coding 2
Agentic 3
Factuality 2
Long Context 1
Other shared benchmarks 9
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.