MiMo V2 Flash vs Sarvam 30B
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
MiMo V2 Flash is the stronger all-rounder.Sarvam 30B is cheaper.
Scores updated · 22 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software40MiMo V2 Flash4 of 4 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30MiMo V2 Flash3 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20MiMo V2 Flash2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20MiMo V2 Flash2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10MiMo V2 Flash1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10MiMo V2 Flash1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Sarvam 30B costs 66% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where MiMo V2 Flash pulls ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+39.4points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+37.7points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+25.7points ahead
Where Sarvam 30B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 22 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMiMo V2 Flash
- SWE-bench VerifiedMiMo V2 Flash by 39.473.434+39.4
- Terminal-Bench HardMiMo V2 Flash by 25.7282.3+25.7
- SciCodeMiMo V2 Flash by 20.239.419.2+20.2
- LiveCodeBench v6MiMo V2 Flash by 10.680.670+10.6
AgentsMiMo V2 Flash
- BrowseCompMiMo V2 Flash by 22.858.335.5+22.8
- GDPValMiMo V2 Flash by 6.66.60+6.6
ReasoningMiMo V2 Flash
- GPQA DiamondMiMo V2 Flash by 21.384.663.3+21.3
- Humanity's Last ExamMiMo V2 Flash by 15.322.87.5+15.3
- CritPtMiMo V2 Flash by 44.30.3+4
FactsMiMo V2 Flash
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMiMo V2 Flash by 12.224.812.6+12.2
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMiMo V2 Flash by 2.96.63.7+2.9
Following instructionsMiMo V2 Flash
- IFBenchMiMo V2 Flash by 37.764.226.5+37.7
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)MiMo V2 Flash by 60.59534.5+60.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMiMo V2 Flash by 41.949.87.9+41.9
- Arena-Hard-V2MiMo V2 Flash by 37.286.249+37.2
- AA-OmniscienceMiMo V2 Flash by 26.2-45.4-71.5+26.2
- AA IntelligenceMiMo V2 Flash by 14.220.86.6+14.2
- HMMT 2025MiMo V2 Flash by 10.284.474.2+10.2
- MMLU-ProMiMo V2 Flash by 4.984.980+4.9
- AIME 2025Sarvam 30B by 2.694.196.7+2.6
- AA Agentic Indextie1211.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, MiMo V2 Flash or Sarvam 30B?
MiMo V2 Flash wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Sarvam 30B wins none, but costs 66% less.
Which is better for coding?
MiMo V2 Flash. It wins 4 of the 4 coding tests both models report; Sarvam 30B wins none.
Which is cheaper?
MiMo V2 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Sarvam 30B costs $0.03 and $0.11. That makes Sarvam 30B about 66% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 22 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.