Nemotron 3 Nano Omni vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Wins 4 of 6 areas
Coding · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct is better at reasoning.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Nemotron 3 Nano Omni2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up10Nemotron 3 Nano Omni1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Nemotron 3 Nano Omni1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Nemotron 3 Nano Omni1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking01Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct1 of 3 tests · 2 ties
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni costs 2% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Nemotron 3 Nano Omni pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+32points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+11.9points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+9.2points ahead
Where Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+15.1points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+2.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni
- SciCodeNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 9.227.818.6+9.2
- Terminal-Bench HardNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 6.88.31.5+6.8
ReasoningQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by 15.146.962+15.1
- Humanity's Last Examtie4.84.6tie
- CritPttie00tie
FactsNemotron 3 Nano Omni
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 11.914.32.4+11.9
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie15.214.3tie
Images and chartsEven
- OCRBenchv2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni by 4.565.861.3+4.5
- MMMU-ProQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by 2.353.255.5+2.3
Long documentsNemotron 3 Nano Omni
- AA-LCRNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 39.739.70+39.7
Following instructionsNemotron 3 Nano Omni
- IFBenchNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 3263.231.2+32
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni by 28.945.316.4+28.9
- AA-OmniscienceNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 11.9-57.4-69.3+11.9
- AA IntelligenceNemotron 3 Nano Omni by 4.310.36+4.3
- OCRBench v2 (Chinese)Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by 15960+1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni or Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, facts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins reasoning. They are level on images and charts.
Which is better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.97. That makes Nemotron 3 Nano Omni about 2% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.